A reminder that the New York Times coverage of Section 230 has been dishonest for a long time.

The "paper of record" relentlessly frames this a Congressional favor for tech giants. In fact, the law protects freedom of expression -- yours and mine -- on the sites where we share, and the ones we own. It also protects our right to edit.

This is about money, and control. Traditional media have less of both due to the Internet. They want it back.

Who compensates me libel or is libel no longer actionable? Assume the original post is from a fictional entity but it's been shared 500 times by real persons. Where's my cause of action directed?