It's good to see @pluralistic walking Sam Seder and the Majority Report audience through the social, economic and political context of Prince's decision to change his name in the 90s. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwVtZsnF_iE
The Real Reason Prince Changed His Name In The 90s Will Surprise You

YouTube

Back in 1996, I archived Prince's own first-person narrative of why he changed his name, which he briefly published on his website and then quickly pulled down. After his passing, I brought it back online for the first time in two decades.The long-lost "Message from The Artist": https://medium.com/@anildash/message-from-the-artist-c611535da21c

"I was beyond frustrated with my lack of control over my career and music."

Message from The Artist - Anil Dash - Medium

“ O(+>has officially given notice to Warner Bros. Records (WBR) of his desire to terminate his recording agreement with the company. Over the course of their nearly two decade long relationship, The…

Medium
@anildash
I, too, appreciate the irony of posting his written word that he’d decided to not keep published. The processes of creative people is always very interesting to me.
I also have spent time with visual artists and am intrigued by the similarities and differences between how art ownership is retained (or not) after the sale. Rights vs Ownership, etc. I’ve been told by many visual artists that once they sell a painting or a photograph they no longer have, nor expect, control over what happens with that piece of art. When looked at in some ways, it seems odd to sell your children, or access to them, but still want to own, control and profit from them.
When an artist makes a thing, who are they making it for? When they sell it, does that change the thing?