
@4somecurious @westly it’s not so much “do guns kill people?”, it’s more like, “what are the scenarios in which people are dying by gunshot, and what patterns are there that we might change in order to save lives”.
Same thing happened with cigarettes - it wasn’t just “is smoking bad for you”, it was “what can we do to reduce the harm caused by cigarettes - what actual changes would have the most benefit?”
Funding to do the same kind of research for guns is always completely blocked by the GOP.
@4somecurious @westly which day next week are you planning to start the revolution? And how many people do you have lined up to participate? (No need for exact numbers, you can round to the nearest 10,000).
Unless you have serious answers for the above, we need to talk in terms of working to change the system from within. Getting the government to acknowledge there •is• a problem is one of the first steps.
@4somecurious @westly at the risk of repeating myself, I thought I made it very clear, several times that, no, we don’t need research to show that guns kill people. The research would be to show from a public health standpoint, how guns compare to the other risks in modern society and come up with solutions.
I get that you’d like to round them all up tomorrow. Would you like a detailed explanation of the ways in which that’s unrealistic? It doesn’t matter if it’s a great idea, it won’t happen.
@4somecurious @westly getting outraged, by itself, may be cathartic, but doesn’t solve problems.
I can see a variety of solutions. Most (all?) of them have big giant well-funded roadblocks in the way. What solutions do you propose. Not “what are you angry about?” or “what is a problem?”, but what workable solutions to the problem do you have that we can implement?
If you have this obvious solution you suggest, burning a hole in your pocket, tell us what it is.