@sbi @AstroKatie @Charles imagine you're a 2D person living on the surface of a balloon and someone's blowing up that balloon. your universe is expanding, you can observe it doing so, but that doesn't help you define the "centre" of the spherical surface that is your universe ('cause there isn't one). the balloon has a centre, sure, but it's also got one more dimension than you.
so we might be living on the 3D surface of a 4D torus, if that helps.
@sbi @pierrotechnique @AstroKatie @Charles
The "Real" center in the balloon analogy is unreachable and imperceivable to anyone on the 2D surface.
Adding a dimension to everything, we live in a 3D space 'surface' of a 4D space-time universe, and the "Real" center would be...
OVER THERE->
(Imagine that I am pointing backwards in time... )
@sbi @pierrotechnique @AstroKatie @Charles
Not exactly. "The Center" no longer exists as a spatially localizable point in space.
~13.7Bya everything was within micrometers and milliseconds of The Center, but what *was* that tiny dense volume is now spread out across more space than anyone anywhere "inside" can see due to the inflation of space.
Points in space aren't persistent entities. They're only "points" because we cannot perceive the time-cones through space-time that they represent.