Podcaster who has repeatedly accused me of being a Nazi supporter gets cancelled for being a sex pest.

Gosh, that’s a shame.

@Popehat I read Torrez's (brief) tweet upon that stuff back in the day. He thought it was unethical that Randazza's stuff was on your website (and maybe more but that's all I read).

Would be curious on your own perspective/summary on it. Understand if you don't want to, though.

@gerakion @Popehat Ken might not, but I will. It's just the classic "guilt by association" nonsense fallacy that constantly gets leveled at 1A lawyers who defend the speech of odious people.

You'd think that a Harvard Law grad like Torrez would understand and respect the free speech principle even if he disagreed with it, but evidently that wasn't the case. And hey look, surprise, guy who makes bad faith accusation was also a hypocrite, wow, absolutely floored.

@everythingisdata @Popehat The criticism of Randazza seems very called for when looking at the balance of who he represented (although perhaps not to the level of Nazi).

Attacking Ken for associating with Randazza is a much stronger claim, though.

I don't think Andrew's claim was in bad faith, and while a humongous hypocrite that in and of itself doesn't mean his argument is categorically wrong. Though again, it certainly is eyebrow raising.

@gerakion @Popehat I think that "not to the level of Nazi" gets precisely to the point. That was an exceptional accusation that didn't come with any evidence to support it other than inneundo.

Completely gratuitous, and especially unbecoming of a trained lawyer. IMO.