I've said it before and I'll say it again -- I'm not getting more liberal, but I am definitely getting more anti-"conservative," as that term is degraded and debased by the modern Right.

https://radleybalko.substack.com/p/tyre-nichols-wasnt-murdered-because

Tyre Nichols wasn't murdered because of "affirmative action"

Rather than defend an indefensible murder, right-wing pundits have latched on to a narrative that's somehow even more appalling

The Watch
@Popehat It's being debased by journalism, too -- because news orgs are using "conservative" to describe extremism. They're buying the extremists' language wholesale.
@dangillmor @Popehat While I've mostly switched over to using the term "reactionary" for the social side of it, and "fascist" for the broader political project (both are more precisely accurate, philosophically and historically), nothing we're seeing now is all that out of character from the perspective of the history of American conservatism, including its mainstream. It's just louder and less concerned with social desirability.

@arossp @dangillmor @Popehat

Exactly. Consider William F Buckley Jr — if anyone could be said to have personified 'intellectual conservatism' it was Buckley. The guy had a national weekly show on PBS for 3 decades.

But he was such an unrepentant mccarthyite that he literally wrote and published a book of mccarthy fanfic a few years before his death.

Serious conservatism has been a thin, highly-polished veneer over this roiling, inchoate madness the entire time.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0316115894

Amazon.com

@Spicewalla @dangillmor @Popehat I mean, here’s Buckley talking to a bunch of New York cops in 1965, telling them the reason America’s police are disliked is because the civil rights movement is just “infatuated with revolution and ideology.” This is pure reactionary nonsense. https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Catholic_William_F_Buckley_Jr/duQjAwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=buckley+%22It+is+no+accident+at+all+that+the+police+should+be+despised+in+an+age+infatuated+with+revolution+and+ideology%22&pg=PA13&printsec=frontcover
The Catholic William F. Buckley, Jr.

William F. Buckley, Jr. was a prominent conservative American political commentator who was known for his rhetorical brilliance and frequent wit. In his eighty-two- plus years, he founded National Review, wrote fifty-five books, thousands of columns, hosted hundreds of Firing Line television shows, and became recognized as the founder of the modern conservative movement. The first major conference on William F. Buckley, Jr. was convened by the Portsmouth Institute, in 2009, specifically to explore the role William F. Buckley, Jr.'s Catholic faith played in the formation of his thought and work. This volume of the Portsmouth Review, edited by Portsmouth Institute director James MacGuire, contains the proceedings of that conference with contributions by James L. Buckley, Peter Flanigan, Father George Rutler, Maggie Gallagher, Kathryn Jean Lopez, Roger Kimball, Joseph Bottum, E.J. Dionne, Lee Edwards, Clark Judge and Neal Freeman. There are additional articles by Christopher Buckley and Doms Damian Kearney and Paschal Scotti O.S.B.William F. Buckley, Jr., though blessed with an impervious faith, was not always predictable in his Catholic views. He resisted reforms of Vatican II, questioned many of the Church’s teachings, and was the first to confess that he was no theologian. With all this in mind, The Catholic William F. Buckley, Jr. is an essential resource for understanding what animated and inspired one of the great public intellectuals of the second half of the 20st century.

Google Books