THIS.
@Heartsonycgr @junkyardspaceship perhaps you would like to study history and understand how many law enforcement agencies were born from the desire to control black people. Here's a useful primer for you.
https://ekuonline.eku.edu/blog/police-studies/brief-history-slavery-and-origins-american-policing/
I would then suggest that the inherent power boundary of law enforcement is the critical factor referred to in the original post, not guns.
Police brutality NOT gun violence are the triggers for recent police criticism.
@Heartsonycgr @junkyardspaceship if you think that gun culture is the reason for an adversarial relationship between the police and the public then:
1) you know very little about history
2) you have no comprehension of systemic racism within the USA
3) And you appear you have forgotten that slavery and segregation are even a thing
I bet Rosa Parks felt an adversarial relationship with the police because of guns and nothing to do with segregation & discrimination.
Idiot.
@Heartsonycgr @junkyardspaceship Imagine trying to take the intellectual high ground with a bio that uses the nonexistent word scotophile in it.
Scotophil, is a word; and it seems more apt for you as it refers to something that thrives in darkness.
Someone who loves Scotland would be an Anglophile. Although "lover of Scotland" would be more correct as it specifies the country rather than the nation.
Just read some books.
@zigg I dug a bit deeper, and also found it listed on this Red Bubble shop: https://www.redbubble.com/i/sticker/Cops-Aren-t-Supposed-to-Kill-Guilty-People-Either-Protest-Sign-BLM-Black-Lives-Matter-End-Police-Brutality-by-danadrewdles/54152688.EJUG5
Now that in itself isn't really conclusive as Red Bubble is full of people taking credit for other people's work unfortunately...
But Dana Drewdles does have a website with portfolio work, and while I couldn't find this image listed on it, her other work does seem to have the same style: https://www.danadrewdles.com/
@junkyardspaceship @dramypsyd
121K Likes, 2,437 Comments - dana drew (@danadrewdles) on Instagram: "And what about people who aren’t guilty? What’s the excuse for their murders? • No one should be shot multiple times by the police. With no confirmed weapon or attack. In the back. Seven times. In front of their children. Especially during a otherwise nonviolent interaction. And yes - regardless of their criminal history. • And please stop sharing video of it and forcing others to live through the trauma. We don’t need to see graphic videos of violence against black lives to believe them that this is real. Please see my story and “social justice” highlight for ways to help. • This is not fucking political. The police are not the judge, jury and executioner. No one should live in fear of the police because of their race. Unarmed and compliant civilians should never be murdered by those who are meant to protect them. If this is a “mistake” or “not all cops” then the system should be fucking fixed. Funding should be given to systems that will prevent and deescalate, not aggravate and overreact. • This was of my first drawings for this page back in June. It says a lot about our country that this is hands down the most “controversial” drawing I’ve posted based on the many comments and DMs. It actually was the catalyst to my lengthy blocked words list. This helps protect me from seeing the rage of racist, Trump loving users on this app, some of whom even sent me death threats over this particular little doodle. • So many comments like, “They should if they’re being shot at.” This bizarre redirect is pathetic and transparent. None of the black lives taken by police in the non-violent moments were shooting at anyone. Imagine being so blind to a problem that this is your reply? Or rather, so scared of losing your own privileges and power that you (actively or without realizing - both fucked up) choose to continue to oppress and support the murder of BIPOC through systematic racism? • Alarming how much my drawing skills have improved in a matter of three months and how little has been done to improve the safety of black lives in the hands of the police. #defundthepolice"
@junkyardspaceship Police shouldn't be killing ANYONE, period. The purpose of the police is not to be the public's last line of defense or whatever white supremacist machismo bullshit they think they are. Their job is to PROTECT and SERVE. Of course, violence will happen, but the police should never initiate it, only respond to it.
Our system of law DOES NOT work. Police officers are less disciplined than mafia triggermen, courts are actively working to disenfranchise and dehumanize those that write their checks, and a worryingly large percentage of our elected officials want to force us under their boot heels.
This issue does not stem from the police, but from the broken, rotten foundations on which this country was built. We the People need to come together to change this from the ground up, or we may never get the chance if the people who benefit most from this system get their way.
Fourteenth Amendment
"... No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws ..."
Notice that thing about life. If you can't stop the cop from killing, the killer cop must face the scrutiny of due process of law.
@junkyardspaceship
100% this
Arrest someone isn't permission to impose the death penalty.