One of the things I'm finding so interesting about large language models like GPT-3 and ChatGPT is that they're pretty much the world's most impressive party trick
All they do is predict the next word based on previous context. It turns out when you scale the model above a certain size it can give the false impression of "intelligence", but that's a total fraud
It's all smoke and mirrors! The intriguing challenge is finding useful tasks you can apply them to in spite of the many, many footguns
And in case this post wasn't clear: I'm all-in on large language models: they confidently pass my personal test for if a piece of technology is worth learning:
"Does this let me build things that I could not have built without it?"
What I find interesting is that - on the surface - they look like they solve a lot more problems than they actually do, partly thanks to the confidence with which they present themselves
Figuring out what they're genuinely good for is a very interesting challenge
@Sandra I've not found that argument very convincing yet
Sure, there's a HUGE energy cost in training a model... but that model can then be put to use for many years into the future
text-davinci-003 was trained once, at great expense... but has since run inference millions (probably billions) of times for millions of people
This looks even better for openly released models like Stable Diffusion: trained once, then distributed to anyone who wants to use it
@Sandra I remember being amused when I saw one model that was trained by a university in France that boasted that 90% of the power used to train that model came from a nearby nuclear reactor!
Wish I could find that reference now
Simon Willison
Sandra