Ben Davis on the "willful misreading of dystopia" at MoMA 's "woozy, semi-random, art-like... with wispy, unresolved edges" exhibition of machine spat images from their archive.

https://news.artnet.com/art-world/refik-anadol-unsupervised-moma-2242329

An Extremely Intelligent Lava Lamp: Refik Anadol’s A.I. Art Extravaganza at MoMA Is Fun, Just Don’t Think About It Too Hard

"Refik Anadol: Unsupervised" at the Museum of Modern Art is a new high water mark for generative A.I. in the museum.

Artnet News

@geraldine "The most crowd-pleasing of these simulates a seething, gravity-defying cloud of colorful fluid, the palette based on colors derived from the works in MoMA’s collection. New colors are constantly swirling into the image and taking over, the whole thing surging in and out restlessly, like a psychedelic, drugged-out ocean wave."

(nods) Ah, yes, a screensaver

@bstacey @geraldine

I hear you. Screensavers can be meaningful tho. What stood out to me feels most indicative of AI in general - surface memesis over the cultural signifigance inherent in human-powered mark-making.

"What the endorsement of “Unsupervised” as an alternative-art-history simulator insinuates, for its audience, is that art history is just a bunch of random visual tics to be permuted, rather than an archive of symbol-making practices with social meanings."

@geraldine good text, valid critique.
@geraldine This makes me think of the closing SXSW talk that @bruces gave a few years back talking about a new generation of artists that was going to dismantle dystopia. Not there yet.
@geraldine anadol's work is just the art version of this tweet