@norfolknomad @1970sLondon

As an aside, the old system of counting in 12s rather than 10s is, I summise, why we stop at the 12 times table, and continue to do so, even though we no longer do things in 12s.

12 old pence to the shilling;
12 inches to the foot.

@Jon6705 @[email protected] @[email protected]
12s are very useful in terms of packaging, logistics etc: you can split 12 by 2, 3, 4 and 6, which makes a dozen a very flexible base to work from. 10 can only be halved, so I’d argue the 12x table is still invaluable.

@philipdowner @norfolknomad @1970sLondon

Very good point.

The number of factors of 12 is more than the number of factors of 10.