Nature issues its rules for use of LLMs in science papers:
1. ChatGPT can't be an author because it cannot be responsible.
2. Transparency.
Sensible.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00191-1

Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use

As researchers dive into the brave new world of advanced AI chatbots, publishers need to acknowledge their legitimate uses and lay down clear guidelines to avoid abuse.

@jeffjarvis Totally agree with this approach. Credit it as a tool used sure, but not as an author. Authors of science papers first do the research and then write it up