This was already discussed ad nauseum on the bird app but since some are doubling down--and the larger debate is definitely live--let me add a few things here.

1. This is a bizarre criticism of this particular FTC which has emphasized fair v unfair competition (as opposed to a competitive market in the abstract) as its core mandate in general and in this particular proposed rule.

https://jacobin.com/2023/01/noncompete-clause-labor-market-banned-federal-trade-commission-competition

“Noncompete Clauses” Should Be Outlawed — but Not in the Name of “More Competition”

The Federal Trade Commission has proposed banning “noncompete clauses” in labor contracts. It’s a win for workers, but the FTC’s rationale — a blind devotion to “competition” as the solution to injustices in the labor market — is wrongheaded and dangerous.

Beyond that, what's funny is that the author's focus & commitment to a one dimensional idea of a competitive market as a normative/analytic baseline prevents him from seeing how the FTC (and Law generally) can channel competition in qualitatively distinct, and better or worse, distinctions.

So not only would the rule prevent an unfair method or tactic of competition (Which these agreements binding workers are), but it also does increase competition of a valuable sort: namely rivalry between businesses in competing for workers.

That's qualitatively distinct--just a different real world phenomenon--from business rivalry based on a race to the bottom on wages. But if you just subsume all of that under "labor market competition," you don't see that!