@Popehat
I think there's broad agreement on your point: platforms set and enforce TOS, not government.
The sticky part comes in when we notice everybody is forced to chit-chat on the same platform. There's probably a short-hand word for that phenomenon.
@mikewmerritt
I see lots of Twitter haters on Twitter due to the big network they have over there.
I've been watching several MDs and public health people make a go at Mastodon only to return to Twitter in spite of antivax abuse due to better engagement.
Same thing with Facebook. I don't know anyone who likes it but people use it for their running club or to check on pappy and meemaw or the neighborhood watch.
@mikewmerritt @Popehat
I don't think the problem is money but a network effect.
Analogy: individuals walking down an ally choose where to wander until a crowd forms with a density above a certain threshold. Then the individuals become a fluid with its own dynamics.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/what-fluid-dynamics-can-teach-us-about-navigating-crowds-180961823/
A Twitter user with an engaged following above a certain threshold will experience an emergent state analogous to a dense crowd: a community. Most humans can’t easily leave communities.