@svelmoe @matthew_d_green It is not a fallacy when it's an agenda.
Of course content scanning will be used to censor inconvenient truths. And to hide critical voices.
Full automated, invisible censorship is way too "good" not to use it.
@brettglass @matthew_d_green scanning for hajib correctness would fall under this, no?
So, it's already here. Killing people.
@matthew_d_green What on earth is 'video footage that shows people crossing the Channel in small boats in a "positive light"'?
Are they attempting to censor the news by removing all such footage?
@matthew_d_green
There needs to a place for what should be filtered/blocked. Just a corporate entity and a government Change Request is too blunt an instrument.
I seem to recall FB have group/council to consider those things.
This should be wired into government democratic processes. And there should perhaps be one of these supra-content-moderation councils per country.
Attached: 1 image Ok a more serious comment about the UK Online Safety bill. Back in summer of 2021, when Apple proposed to build client-side “content scanning” into iPhones, Alex Stamos and I worried publicly that some countries would use it for purposes far beyond child abuse imagery. And here in 2023 we now have examples.