https://kolektiva.social/@FractalEcho/109683395390278623
Rua M. Williams (@[email protected])
How do you visualize data that isn't there? How do make a representation, not of absence against presence but of omission?
How do you visualize data that isn't there? How do make a representation, not of absence against presence but of omission?
The measurements of “success” in networked social media do not render visible the actual importance of #MeToo or the broader phenomenon of structural sexual violence. In crucial ways, the structure of #MeToo is not a network. If we insist on mapping #MeToo as a network – the all-encompassing symbol of digital society – we risk missing fundamental elements of the movement that don’t answer to the network analogy. The arbitrary and heavily mediated frame of the 280-character tweet, and Twitter’s “rich- get- richer” network effects, amplify some voices at the expense of others. Mainstream white media are central while ethnic media are minor. White women celebrities are central while Black and Indigenous advocates are marginalized. Since Tarana Burke founded the movement in 2006, its goal has been to break the silence around sexual violence and uplift the voices of survivors. But what happens when the platform works against hearing those voices?