A tiny fraction of Twitter users use third-party apps. So put yourself in the shoes of a bean counter…

"We can't serve ads. We can't sell a subscription. The API costs money. If we kill the clients we lose a few users, but some will stick around."

It makes sense on a spreadsheet, but misses the users' value. They produce the content that brings you to Twitter.

Killing clients is exactly what you expect from people who just don't get social networks, and too arrogant to listen to those who do.

@sandofsky Thing is: They *could* have served ads all this time. Nothing in the Twitter API keeps them from just serving ads as yet another tweet. They could even have changed their API TOS to prevent clients from filtering out ads. We probably would have grudgingly accepted that at the time. They just never bothered to do that.

@uliwitness @sandofsky Ads would’ve made sense imo; the “charge users for API access” thing doesn’t really make sense because it would make the market way too small to support continuing development of 3rd party apps.

It only makes sense as a way to squeeze out a few dollars as you kill the 3rd party apps.