RT @[email protected]

The BBC have branded Prince Harry's new memoir Spare "The weirdest book ever written by a royal".

Which is a great excuse to tell you that in 1597 King James VI & I published the Daemonologie, a book on necromancy, black magic, and how to find, test, and punish witches.

๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿ”—: https://twitter.com/BadWritingTakes/status/1613276217909645312

Bad Writing Takes ๐Ÿ–Š๏ธ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ on Twitter

โ€œThe BBC have branded Prince Harry's new memoir Spare "The weirdest book ever written by a royal". Which is a great excuse to tell you that in 1597 King James VI & I published the Daemonologie, a book on necromancy, black magic, and how to find, test, and punish witches.โ€

Twitter

@LouiseRaw

The main difference for me is that Iโ€™ve read Daemonologie and fully expect to do so again โ€ฆ

@LouiseRaw

Minor history pedantry. In 1597 the ruling monarch in England was Elizabeth I. James VI of Scotland didn't become James I (of England) until 1603. But then he really went mad for publishing superstitious nonsense, with his own version of the Bible no less ๐Ÿ˜‚

@LouiseRaw We just did a heap of research on James VI for our theater unit on Macbeth. Who on earth decided to let that guy revise the bible?
@LouiseRaw Then there was King James' Bible.
Cornell University Library Digital Collections Bookreader

@LouiseRaw My brain initially parsed that as you saying you had written the book with James back in 1597. Time for a coffee.
@LouiseRaw
for some reason I chuckled at the '&c' at the end of James job description.
@LouiseRaw This is probably the only way I would ever even acknowledge a book from the leachโ€ฆroyals much less boost/respond.
@LouiseRaw want a video of an American reading Deamonologie in OP? I haz link! ๐Ÿ˜‚
@LouiseRaw and Daemonologie wasnโ€™t (drumroll) ghost-written
@LouiseRaw Another win for historians! #histodon