@annaspanner

I'm not an EU scholar, so don't take my word for it.

But as far as I can see, the EU's position is this:

The EU regrets Brexit which has caused a lot of harm and a lot of pain in the EU, too.

However, it will not want to see the UK rejoin unless it can be absolutely certain it gets a solid new member that will not cause this kind of upheaval again in the foreseeable future. 1/

@annaspanner

But - and this is not nothing - the EU does want a much closer relation to the UK than is currently the case. It wants cooperation and it wants regulatory alignment because both would solve many current problems. A lot of the distance between the UK and the EU (and in a sense all of it) is the result of unilateral decisions by the UK. 2/

@annaspanner

So a lot of it can be reversed through reversals in the UK. The EU is more than anything a negotiation machine. It will want to negotiate for changes and improvement in UK-EU relations. 3/

@annaspanner

Moreover, not only is it possible for such negotiations to overcome many of the problems caused by Brexit, they are also important stepping stones that invite closer cooperation on a path that may eventually lead to rejoin. 4/

@annaspanner

All of that is what we Danes would call "fremtidsmusik" (future music): hopes and dreams for a better future, but they ARE fairly achievable. 5/

@annaspanner

But, much as I understand the grief, it is worth noticing that if the only positive development we are able to imagine is a full rejoin, then baby steps like these will seem abysmally small in comparison.

If, however, our baseline is 2023, not 2010, then it should be evident that much can be gained and that we can move towards better things together. 6/thread ends

@SuneAuken @annaspanner I very much agree, Sune. There is no way that the EU would want the UK as a member until the political culture in the UK has radically changed.
@SuneAuken @annaspanner Hence the need for a robust reappraisal of the UK voting system and the implementation of a democratic system.
@SuneAuken @annaspanner my apologies for the poor English. No sentence should normally contain the same word twice.

@johnelalamo @annaspanner

I'm a second language writer. I would not have noticed it, if you'd hit me over the head with a hammer and then another hammer. Ooops.

@johnelalamo @SuneAuken @annaspanner That's for some forms of creative writing, surely? If you're using a technical or identifying term use it consistently - then people know the two references are to the same thing, otherwise they're left puzzled as to what the two different references mean, and why they're different if they appear to mean the same thing.
@SuneAuken
@annaspanner
Not suggesting this is an accurate representation of EU versus UK attitudes, but nicely illustrates some of the difference in priorities between administrations.
#GeneralElectionNow #GTTO