(1) The friendship paradox—perfect for the Facebook era; less clear for today’s social media (I don’t use the stuff the kids use so I dunno)
(Too mathy to assign to my undergrads but I lecture it)
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2781907
(2) Nancy DiTomaso’s book The American Non-Dilemma, or this NYT piece by DiTomaso explaining the argument that white people perpetuate racism in hiring less through discrimination than by being helpful & generous to their own networks:
@jeremyfreese vaccine propaganda on YouTube? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505619308743
Ideological divisions among activists in the Egyptian revolution? https://meridian.allenpress.com/mobilization/article/23/1/23/82923/SOLIDARITY-OR-SCHISM-IDEOLOGICAL-CONGRUENCE-AND
@jeremyfreese Maybe also something on the small world phenomenon? Like the Travers and Milgram study?
Mario Small's "Someone to Talk To", potentially.

London, 1772. I have been asked by my superiors to give a brief demonstration of the surprising effectiveness of even the simplest techniques of the new-fangled Social Networke Analysis in the pursuit of those who would seek to undermine the liberty enjoyed by His Majesty’s subjects. This is in connection with the discussion of the role of “metadata” in certain recent events and the assurances of various respectable parties that the government was merely “sifting through this so-called metadata” and that the “information acquired does not include the content of any communications”. I will show how we can use this “metadata” to find key persons involved in terrorist groups operating within the Colonies at the present time. I shall also endeavour to show how these methods work in what might be called a relational manner.