In a couple of different places on Mastodon this week I’ve seen people saying something to the effect of “what does visible alt text matter, it’s for screen readers.”

Here are just a few scenarios why people might want to view alt text visually:

1. “I made the post and I want to double check the alt text I wrote.”
2. “I did not make the post but I want to learn how other people write alt text so I can write better descriptions.”
3. “I’m having trouble making sense of the image but I think a written description would help.”
4. “My vision is enough to read text at my preferred font size but not in a tiny screenshot with jpeg compression.”
5. “This is what works best for me because of reasons I don’t want to get into.”

Accessibility is for everyone. Try not to make assumptions.

@arjache I did a little poll on this recently and almost all of the hundreds of sighted people who answered said that they got something out of the alt text.

Also, not everyone with sight loss who might benefit from a screenreader has access to one (or has the skills/ability to use it). And trying to say it should be hidden away feels really gross to me. :/ I'm glad I haven't seen that, I probably wouldn't react well!

@bright_helpings @arjache - this, yeah. I really enjoy alt text.
@ChazBrenchley @bright_helpings @arjache I'm *genuinely* enjoying what *writing* alt text reveals to me about the subtext of my own photos. It's not that I've never thought, even thought deeply, about it. But in the process of taking a photo, that can only occur in a flash (pun not originally intended), in background. Bringing it out & having to put words to it without just saying, "This is meaning," that is, still leaving interpretation open, is super cool.
@Josiah_Mannion @bright_helpings @arjache - this, yes. Absolutely. And what other people choose to say about their images, it's like a whole new level of conversation within the work.