A reminder that on Mastodon you are the algorithm. If you’re seeing content you don’t want, block or filter it out. Boost things you want more of. You control what you see. It’s better than trying to control others. Focus on curating the kind of feed you’re interested in.

If you don’t want to see politics, unfollow people who post or boost a lot about politics.

The #birdsite is very passive in terms of what it demands from you. Mastodon isn’t. It’s a mind shift but it’s a good one to make.

@VickiKyriakakis I’m of the opinion the algorithmic timeline on Twitter was consistently better. Even with many of the same follows the timeline moves glacially and with less relevance
@palmerc @VickiKyriakakis
Here, you are the algorithm. Boost toots you like to see. I love the idea that no one else is deciding for me, it's entirely up to me.

@Sarahw @VickiKyriakakis Nope. I'm supportive of the aspirations of Mastodon. The reality is, it isn't as good in some fundamental ways. There is absolutely nothing wrong with having an algorithmic timeline that attempts to provide you the information relevant to your current interests. This could be done in parallel with a linear timeline.

Furthermore, the presentation of threaded messages is strictly terrible. Instead of doing the sane thing which is to group them, it posts them reversed

@Sarahw @VickiKyriakakis this 'here you're the algorithm' sounds like the same nonsense you hear in other corners of tech. Leveraging technology to our advantage, to improve our productivity is the name of the game. Who has time for grooming their timeline? I don't. I also don't compile my own kernels anymore.

Mastodon has the advantage of not being profit driven, so it could be even better at presenting users the news/messages they want when they want it and still offer the other style.

@palmerc but who can decide better than you what you want to see? As for not having time, surely you just do that as you go along?
Also, please excuse my ignorance, what does compiling my own kernels mean?
I agree about presentation, other people have used different apps that make Mastodon more user friendly.

@Sarahw Well let's start with the kernel.

Back in the day... early adopters of Linux had to spend time compiling their Linux kernel to get things just right. It was a point of pride and one of the things we loved about Linux. Do it yourself. Late 90s into the early 2000s.

The control Microsoft exerted over the tech industry was immense and it made everything a pain.

Twitter and Facebook are now turn of the century Microsoft.

@Sarahw as for deciding what I see, absolutely. A linear or algorithmic timeline is just a technological choice. Follows, likes, boosts, reading and engaging with a profile are all ways to provide insight into your 'choices' without resorting to hand-crafting your bespoke timeline. Now I think the linear timeline is nice to have, but the algorithmic one is what people prefer because they just want it to work.
@Sarahw this has some parallels with the search engine wars. Before Google upended everything with a superior algorithm, the search engines like Yahoo! were attempting to curate websites or had less-than-great algorithms. Algorithmic won, because it was simply better.
@palmerc the main problem I have with algorithms is that they are so prone to manipulation, that goes for search engines too. We end up seeing what others want us to see, not what we decide. Yes it appears to be easier, but I'd rather be in control myself.

@Sarahw that depends on how you define, "what we decide." Does it need to be a conscious decision every time? If I read an article, drill down, check the author's profile, respond, aren't those all indicators of my interest? If I consistently scroll past anything with cats, isn't that a choice? Good algorithms should reflect those choices.

When you ask a search engine for something you know nothing about, isn't its job to tell you what others think?