I am forever grateful to him for building & popularizing Mastodon, but I don't think @Gargron should be working on features at all right now.

Instead, he and the Mastodon non-profit (and a whole bunch of others) should be figuring out governance for collectively making decisions about Mastodon. Features in the Fediverse shouldn't be up to one guy, or even one company.

That's the whole point of the Fediverse. We do this together, or not at all.

@blaine @Gargron Not sure if this will happen: https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/17107#issuecomment-1027200402

Some more discussions happening here:
https://discourse.joinmastodon.org/t/mastodon-project-governance/215/52?page=2

I believe governance is generally an important for the health of an OSS project.

Project governance and transparency · Issue #17107 · mastodon/mastodon

Pitch Hi, (Sorry if this isn't the right place, I couldn't find a better one.) Since its creation, Mastodon's impact and user base are growing fast, as the best decentralized social network we have...

GitHub
@kiview This is helpful context! Have you seen any more recent discussion (i.e., since the #twittermigration raised the stakes)?
@matt No, it was just my first find after searching for "Mastodon Governance" :D