@jurjen_heeck @twit_terrorist @Gargron
One can simply link to a post, but the nicely formatted graph data doesn't display. I don't see the difference in linking to URL or quote posting. I think if you post something to a public website, others should be able to interact with that post. Turning off comments, muting, blocking are legit methods to control your personal experience, but pre-editorializing who can link to a public post I think goes too far.
https://elk.zone/mastodon.nl/@jurjen_heeck/109623908803719520
@awarsing @jurjen_heeck @twit_terrorist @Gargron the difference is the immediate visibility of the content combined with, often as seen on Twitter, a call to pile-on or otherwise disparage the original post / author.
We see this happening a LOT on Twitter. We really donāt need to add routes for bullying and abuse here.
@jonasnuts @jurjen_heeck @awarsing @twit_terrorist @Gargron Youāre right, people are toxic not features but people use features and we ignore that at our peril.
You donāt have to be just a booster. Start your own conversation based on something youāve seen! It takes fractionally more effort and is massively more valuable to the community.
Why do you assume only positive usage?
Your quote also applies to the trolling so regularly associated with quotes on Twitter currently.
We say that people are the algorithm on Mastodon. People can push bad agendas. Mastodon has been insulated from that in part due to relatively small numbers of users. As that is growing so does the danger of pile-ons. Things went āviralā long before the algorithms got involved.
I maintain you can do all you mentioned previously without quotes