@abundance @Devilstower I think it's all because it's not a zero sum game. In many cases, if employees just went and got on with their labour by themselves, their labour would be worth less than it is as part of a well-organised company.
So for a business to hire someone can be a win-win: the employer pays less than the labour is worth, but the employees still make more than they would do without the employer.
Doesn't mean it always works that way, of course.
@statsguy @Devilstower Agree. I also don't think most employers are mere rent-seekers. They risk their investment in the business and they spend their time & money to make the business successful.
If employees could make as much money without the employer - well, then they should.
@rote_chili @abundance @Devilstower Seems to me there is an important distinction here between big businesses and small businesses.
Big businesses are often supported by financial institutions, rather than any entrepreneurs risking their own money.
Very different for small businesses. As a former small business owner, I can promise you that the government doesn't come and bail you out if you go bust.