Thanks to the people who explained the utility of QTs and why they might be useful to implement here in some form or other, it was a good conversation. Not so much to the person who resorted to personal attacks for daring to question the utility of their favourite Twitter feature. I thought this place was supposed to be different 🤷‍♂️
@ctrlaltrees You've probably heard of US tech writer Taylor Lorenz who every once in a while says QTs are an important part of her job to add context and then comments get extremely heated up.
I can see both sides of the argument - yes, the function has been a major factor in toxicity there, used a lot to drive dogpiling, but also to add context or say "hey this person is cool, give them a follow". Personally I think the feature should be implemented, but not as it is on twitter.
@ctrlaltrees Ultimately I'd rather put the decision at the hand of people if they want to have their posts commented, maybe just allowing people they also follow or follow them, maybe by having that to be a request like messages on meta platforms from people you're not following, maybe with community whitelists people can subscribe, idk.