Privatizing local public libraries?
Yes, and ongoing. article about one pending takeover: https://bookriot.com/huntsville-public-library-privatization/
The vendor cited is:
https://www.lsslibraries.com/who-we-are/
Yow. New to me.
What do you think?
Privatizing local public libraries?
Yes, and ongoing. article about one pending takeover: https://bookriot.com/huntsville-public-library-privatization/
The vendor cited is:
https://www.lsslibraries.com/who-we-are/
Yow. New to me.
What do you think?
libraries are...
Not Dead Yet.
These are the Best time to be in libraries because they are in transition. Transitions are a time libraries need help, and libraries can be helped.
We need to keep the spirit of "Free to All" of the Boston Public Library.
All hands on deck.
Agreed-- as much as I love print, it is digital that is our way forward.
As for the @internetarchive we are preserving one copy of every physical and digital published work we can (now millions of copies of both physical books and digitized books for instance).
for reference work, at least, digital is the way to go.
@brewsterkahle @tia6o @drmna @internetarchive
Books are a societies memory.
We should keep both paper and digital.
We need a cycle. Book -> digital -> book -> ...
1 Create multiple copies of a book on archival paper. Store in multiple places.
2 Digitize the book with current technology.
Make it free to the world like Gutenberg.org.
Revise copyright. It is way to long.
3 Every ... years repeat step 1
Digital is short term as it fast changing.
Paper is long term and hardly changing at all.