The debate about QTs is interesting because as far as I tell, all sides are correct.

• QTs let you introduce a topic to your followers w/ tailored commentary (Black Twitter is the best at this)

• They bring fame & attention to the worst people in the world

• They cause dogpiles

• They’re a great format for humor, which 🦣 needs more of

• They are often performative dunking “look at this loser”

• They let you address a side issue or add a different perspective w/o derailing the primary convo

@sbarolo I think I'm not alone in the opinion that it should be implemented BUT with restrictions configurable by the user:

[ ] Restrict to public posts

[ ] Allow followers
[ ] require manual authorization
[ ] Allow follows
[ ] require manual authorization
[ ] Allow mutuals
[ ] require manual authorization

This would save us a lot of headaches.

@yuki2501 @sbarolo Manual authorization? Would that mean I have to approve every QT that hits my account?

@yuki2501 @pburke46 @sbarolo If you chose that setting, presumably.

It would be good to have a third option, of no QT allowed, either as a default or specific to individual posts.