> It’s one of the reason I’ve pushed back on supporting alternate aligners in the nf-core consensus reads from UMIs pipeline: fastquorum. I’ve found that getting the nf-core RNASeq pipeline working for clients is very cumbersome, and folks are invariably disappointed about how long it takes to customize it. It’s too complex. So that’s why I’m pushing hard to keep fastquorum as simple as possible. Do one thing well; a jack of trades is a master of none.

@tangming2005: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/%F0%9F%8E%AF-ming-tommy-tang-40650014_release-nf-corernaseq-v310-rhodium-rudolph-activity-7011483161855426560-cjQk?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios