@theintercept can you verify that this is you? On your Twitter, the *pinned* post does not include any link to or mention of Mastodon account.
Additionally, you haven't verified yourself through the HTML method on other websites (including your own), and for The Intercept (which deals with technical means of information verification) this strikes me as highly suspicious.
@00Aaron @theintercept Because the lack of evidence that says it isn't. The lack of motive to say that it isn't them. It's not bot. It's not sharing non-intercept affiliate news. Even some of their journalist is here, none of them saying that the account is parody or bot. Also their instance is know to host journalist.
No concrete evidence that the account isn't theirs. Apart from your suspicion.
Verification isn't about looking for evidence that it isn't X, it's about having a chain of trust from what you know is X to what you think may be associated with X.
If verification was as you say, any good impersonator who avoided showing ulterior motives is actually one in the same with the actual thing. That's not how it works.
I welcome The Intercept putting this all to bed and showing what a paranoid fool I am by taking any step whatsoever that draws a line from its website or other trusted social media accounts to this one.
And yet it hasn't done it.