I’m rather 🤷‍♂️ about going after Twitter using the EU Digital Markets Act (DMA).

Sure, the framework is there, but Musk is tearing through Twitter at such a rate that what is going to be left by the time action can be taken?

Same re. the initiative to invite Musk to the European Parliament - there’ll be plenty of grandstanding but it’s not going to save the network.

It all feels like… closing the stable door after the horse has bolted.

Sure I get why - even now - being seen to do and say the right thing is politically appealing.

I also get why some politicians would like a bit of theatre by grilling Musk in the European Parliament.

But the damage is done. It can’t be repaired. We need better systems and networks moving forward - prevention rather than cures.

Or putting it another way: the rhetoric of EU politicians is somehow to save Twitter as a network. To right the wrongs.

Perhaps the alternative is preferable? Grind it into insolvency as fast as possible - as a warning to others as to what happens if you mess with the EU on digital policy in future.

It’s one hell of a big sacrificial lamb though…

@jon Jon, is Mastadon in scope for the DSA/DMA?
@joshsherer As a whole, no. But some instances are, yes. Depends on the size of the instance.
@jon thanks. Interesting that the “platform” isn’t analysed as a singularity but on a per instance basis. It would probably make sense for the whole platform to ensure it is compliant though.