Re: https://mastodon.social/@lrhodes@merveilles.town/109552108127349128

Another important warning from the pawoo acquisition: The purchaser, Mask Network, is a cryptotoken company that pushes the "web3" myth and openly runs NFT scams*. A lot of people comment that when Twitter started failing it was ActivityPub that wound up being the decentralized way forward, not blockchain tech, but blockchain scammers have a financial interest in making it look otherwise. (1/2)

* Explaining this comment to ward off lawsuits: all NFT sales are scams.

In other words, blockchain/NFT scammers find marks by associating themselves with literally whatever sounds good— financial liberation, musicians, distributed networks, "green energy". Now that Mastodon is starting to culturally "look good", the blockchain/NFT scammers have an incentive to find ways to associate themselves with it and possibly even try to take credit for it after the fact. And though they have no useful technology, they *do* have VC money to spend on PR and acquisitions. (2/2)
@mcc but VC money is drying up. That’s why Twitter, Facebook, NFTs, and crypto are dying. It’s why Google is losing money. Inflation means that it now costs money to lend money, and tech companies are struggling make up the profit they need.

@someMAHoo @mcc Sooo...your thesis that VC money is drying up may be sound, but throwing in "google is losing money" suggests this is a desired state rather than anything factual.

Google made $46b in the first 9 months of 2022. If you have evidence this is wrong, please provide it to the SEC.

@UrbanEdm @mcc many of these companies are still making money, but not the easy money they once were. Hence the ridiculous $8 Twitter Blue, ads on Netflix, and price hikes across the board. As for Google, they’re still profitable, but their profits decline 27% in Q3. Yes, it’s a profit, but it’s not the profit that investors expect or reward.
Google profits plummet 27 percent in Q3 2022 earnings report

Google shut down a bunch of projects this quarter, and now we see why.

Ars Technica