As many suspected:
“Midjourney Founder Admits to Using a ‘Hundred Million’ Images Without Consent”
As many suspected:
“Midjourney Founder Admits to Using a ‘Hundred Million’ Images Without Consent”
@moultano it's fair to say that analogy is not exact here (Dryhurst talks about this too), though I think the principle is the same on many fronts.
The scale could never be ofc.
@moultano
To the end of preventing memorization?
I feel like it's already past human artists in some ways by having a similarity-queryable dataset if people are worried.
And that post by OpenAI on deduplication and (ironically) that one on Stable Diffusion's regurgitation that notes the imagenet LDE sees no significant memorization make me very not-worried about memorization.
@TedUnderwood @moultano definitely: https://openai.com/blog/dall-e-2-pre-training-mitigations/
This one is a big deal!!!
https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.03860
And this one is frustrating but ironically reassuring given that they see dataset seems to be the primary problem/mitigator.
In order to share the magic of DALL·E 2 with a broad audience, we needed to reduce the risks associated with powerful image generation models. To this end, we put various guardrails in place to prevent generated images from violating our content policy. This post focuses on pre-training mitigations,
@TedUnderwood @moultano They LITERALLY CANNOT DETECT REPLICATION WITH IMAGENET!!! (Pardon my screaming.)
But nobody bothers reading the paper 🙃