If Musk "steps down" as Twitter CEO, per his latest bogus "poll", some things to remember:

1) He'll still be in control. The owner sets the policy the CEO carries out. The owner decides in the end.

2) He lies incessantly. Nothing he says can be trusted, ever.

3) Big Journalism will breathlessly cover the charade as if it meant something, and will continue to support a man who loathes honest reporting and has contempt for genuine freedom of expression.

@dangillmor - Well, there is, in theory, some friction between majority shareholder and CEO. There's the board of directors (largely named by major shareholder). But we know how the Chicago economics nutz trained boards to kow-tow to large shareholders in the name of very short term "shareholder value".
@karlauerbach @dangillmor It's a privately owned company. Musk can operate it as he likes.

@chemoelectric @dangillmor - If and when he brings in other shareholders than it won't be private any longer.

But moreover, as long as it is a "corporation" the legal separation between shareholders, directors, and officers remains. The IRS and state would be extremely interested if it were operated as a sole proprietorship. That's often called "piercing the corporate veil".

@karlauerbach I haven't noticed the SEC caring much about his completely autocratic behavior at his other companies, which are publicly owned. No reason to suspect they'll care about this one, is there? @chemoelectric
@dangillmor @chemoelectric - There is a tendency of money owed but not paid that brings out questions about whether a corporate structure is real or a facade that can be penetrated to reach the pockets of those who would normally be protected.
@karlauerbach @dangillmor The recent WaPo article says he disbanded the board.