Oh, is that so? 😂
@mikegalsworthy
Fascinating how he's trying to construct innocuous sounding "policies" to suppress certain voices, while preserving his free speech vibe. Also fascinating that journalistic orgs are so willing to accept these transparent schemes at face value.

@JoeChip @mikegalsworthy

I think any journalist who operates in an environment where they concede that they could be banned at any moment is succumbing to a form of voluntary censorship. I experienced this in South Africa, as others did I am sure and remember the idea of 'banning'.

Having experienced this I assure you it's not the mark of a 'free speech' environment.

You can read about it here. https://www.britannica.com/topic/banning-South-African-law

Banning | History, Laws & Impact | Britannica

Banning, in South Africa, an administrative action by which publications, organizations, or assemblies could be outlawed and suppressed and individual persons could be placed under severe restrictions of their freedom of travel, association, and speech. Banning was an important tool in the South

Encyclopedia Britannica