I've seen a bizarre amount of trash-talk lately aimed at people - primarily freelance artists - who have expressed concerns about their ability to maintain an audience on Mastodon, because people shouldn't be trying to "make it" here. Because the Fediverse isn't about "building your brand". Because the "popularity contest" of amassing a Twitter following isn't something to strive for here.

The thing is, freelance artists need to be able to make money to LIVE by selling commissions, and if they have no reach (or ability to grow an audience) because of the way Mastodon works, they *can't* make this their Twitter alternative.

I get it, capitalism sucks and nobody wants The Brands to find the Fediverse to be an acceptable target audience, but y'all are the guy in the well haughtily chiding artists for participating in society. You get that, right? You do understand that there's a difference between Beyonce or Skittles and an independent full-time furry artist just trying to sell commissions at $40 a pop to make rent and needing the ability to reach new fans of their work to do so. Don't you?

@alahmnat Twitter had reach because it was one twitter everyone saw. Fediverse was designed not to do that so it couldn't be a twitter alternative. (= not worth advertising on mastodon.)

It's still quite likely the fediverse is going to dreamwidth; it's there, people use it, but it sure ain't livejournal from its glory days.

That's not a personal-preference scale choice; that's a "design decisions a decade ago" scale choice.

I don't know where you get reach now. Maybe someone here does.