@drewharwell the linked article was this, right? https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/12/14/elonjet-twitter-suspension-jack-sweeney-talks/
My guess is that he referred to the link to ElonJet on IG in the article. Problem is that if you define linking to something that contains a link to the problematic material as problematic, where do you stop? All the interwebs is interconnected
Two separate points here:
- Ban for linking to something that contains a link to problematic material. Huge potential for abuse. You can now argue for banning e.g. Google, since it can link to a lot of problematic material incl. ElonJet.
- Others don't seem to be banned for linking to your article. Implies you were singled out as the article author.
Unclear why Linette Lopez was banned but may also be for this reason.
Bans for activity off-site are highly unusual and typically reserved for what FB calls "dangerous organizations" - i.e. Al Qaeda/ISIS/etc. are banned regardless of what they try to post. This aspect seems the most dangerous because the rest only affects Twitter as a platform, but this induces people to censor themselves off Twitter as well for fear of being banned.