Do people on Twitter actually believe this shit?

Mastodon isn't one website.

It's just software that lets you send messages to the Fediverse.

Banning the Fediverse is like banning the web.

Actually, it's *exactly* like banning the web since ActivityPub is a W3C-backed web spec.

Maybe Elon Musk will ban Web 2.0 websites next -- since they use JavaScript, and JavaScript is used to track the whereabouts of his jet.

That makes about as much sense as banning ActivityPub.

Banning the Fediverse is the equivalent of killing your social network's future.

As in, this is the literal future of social media.

Mastodon itself just validates that this is where social media is going next.

Most future social networks will probably use ActivityPub -- and if they don't, they're kneecapping their network effect.

If Big Social doesn't get the memo about the Fediverse soon, they're as good as dead.

@atomicpoet
I feel that celebrities and rich and powerful prefer platforms like Twitter that amplify them. Also, corporations who want to advertise. So it's going to be hard to dislodge them, but when there are a lot of people here, I guess they will be forced to move.
@MrLee If all the celebrities, venture capital firms, and advertisers were fixated on static web 1.0 sites, would we still be using them?
@atomicpoet
It may have delayed the inevitable, but not by much.