Why is the Fed putting the onus of fighting inflation on workers and consumers rather than on the corporations largely responsible for driving up prices — and padding profit margins?

This is wrong. It's bad economics. It’s insane politics. And it’s profoundly unfair.

@rbreich what specifically should they do?

@Terrysagirl @rbreich

The dual mandate is wage suppression and asset inflation.

They are excellent at that

@RainbowBody @rbreich How does the Fed do that?

@Terrysagirl @rbreich

Constant money creation supports asset values.
Anytime there is a hint of wage inflation they raise interest rates.

@RainbowBody @rbreich what other methods would you have them use? Or what would Mr, Reich suggest they do to put the onus on the corporations? What tool is at their disposal?

@Terrysagirl @rbreich

Not inflating assets
And allowing wage growth

@RainbowBody how are they keeping that from happening? I'm not arguing, just trying to understand what real actions they have at their disposal.

@Terrysagirl

My monetary policy professor, an ex fed, explained it this way. You have money supply and interest rates. You peg/control one and let the other float. If you don't, and play both sides it goes to shit.

They jacked money supply and suppressed rates to negative/zero.

The inflation had to happen and it was entirely into assets (real estate, equities.) As soon as any wage pressure they crush it.

I was in this econ class in 1989.

@Terrysagirl

This was effective and horrible policy and tied to tax policy as well.