I've never claimed to be against content moderation.
I've never claimed to be against legally protected speech.
But I do oppose any implication that the two are at odds.
What I do take issue with is an egotistic billionaire declaring himself a philosophically pure absolutist on free speech developing a moderation policy that protects only his own comfort while constantly stating that he will only remove speech that isn't legally protected.
I've never claimed to be against legally protected speech.
But I do oppose any implication that the two are at odds.
What I do take issue with is an egotistic billionaire declaring himself a philosophically pure absolutist on free speech developing a moderation policy that protects only his own comfort while constantly stating that he will only remove speech that isn't legally protected.