@Pwnallthethings Would have it been OK if this was happening in Latin America, Africa, the Middle East or Asia?
Atrocities are atrocities in whatever context.
I hope you didn't mean it in the way it came out.
You are still on time to amend your comments.
@ssfckdt @Pwnallthethings
I am not demanding to conform with my opinion.
I just genuinely thought they didn't mean it.
If that was what they meant... it is just sad.
@Karv @Pwnallthethings
Fair enough.
I believe it was me who took it the wrong way, and I apologize.
Bottom line, I think neither of us can believe we can do this again to anyone anywhere in the world after all our combined history, and that is why it is so disturbing.
@kikobar @Pwnallthethings We all make mistakes sometimes, don't worry too much.
Most of the world is stable. In Asia there is a small chance of a conflict that could grow. The middle east sadly is a powder keg with possible civil wars or minor conflicts - but I doubt a major one would start.
No one expected the invasion and atrocities carried out by the russists either... it was "just sabre-rattling". Stable democracies probably won't start wars. Not sure about autocracies etc. though.
@kikobar it's very possible the thing that makes this war more disturbing, and thus "unthinkable," than some other possibilities is that it's a nuclear-armed power seeking to absorb a neighbor, with all of the geopolitical risks that entails.
You're of course right that wars of conquest ought to be unacceptable anywhere, but the capacity of both the target and the rest of the world to respond is more limited in this instance, and that means we're all a bit on edge.