Whenever I'm trying to read a news article or an academic paper and I'm greeted with "you've run out of free articles for the month" or "sign up to read this!" I just....knowledge should be free. Everyone say it with me now: KNOWLEDGE. SHOULD. BE. FREE. #knowledge #accesstoknowledge #paytoread #dystopia #neolibs #commodification
@IDKWhatsRealAnymore Let’s say all these writings are for free. How are the authors supposed to earn money then?
@aemstuz this is assuming the proceeds from the paywalls all go to the author. But the money goes to the publisher first, who then decides what's appropriate to give back to the author - I'd argue that a publisher, whether news or academic, taking a hit in online subscription revenue and paying their writers more at a base level would be an option. Authors have even spoken out against paywalls since they create hierarchical access to information, as this article suggests: https://www.publishing.umich.edu/stories-of-impact/Breaking%20Down%20the%20Paywall:%20Author%20Relationships%20with%20Open%20Access
@aemstuz I should amend something - it doesnt assume the proceeds all go to the author, but it does imply that those paywalls are the only way an author gets paid
@IDKWhatsRealAnymore True, but the only one viable alternative to paywalls I know are ads and selling users data which are not good as well.
I'm not saying no other alternative exists, just that I don't know others.
@aemstuz nah and that's totally fair - oftentimes we're not even encouraged to think of viable alternatives. For me at least, the place to look is improving worker wages and not relying on the truckle-down economics of getting the publisher more money and then hoping the writers see more in their paycheck as a result, if that makes sense. More of a bottom up approach as opposed to a more top down one