When you disagree with science, the answer is to come up with better science — not to prosecute the science you disagree with.
@tristansnell I do think questions of faith need to be answered before we can ask questions of reason, because faith will determine the reasons we're prepared to accept. Have faith in as few things as possible, but no fewer. And fanaticism is the result of an undersupply of faith, not an oversupply.
Once you've got faith figured out though, yeah, science, math, and philosophy are the way to go.