Sinema.
She started as a Green, then became a D and announced she’s officially Independent.
How does that shift occur?
If one is sincere in belief in Green politics, it does not. Consensus is a pillar of Green politics.
She wore and proclaimed support for the labels of “the Left” on queer issues etc but only because IMHO she was personally affected.
Since being in office she’s courted big business and she seems to DGAF about her constituents.
There is a phenomenon sometimes called the hippie to fascist pipeline. In the last Canadian election, one could see the Green to PPC (far right) pipeline.
These hippies said they wanted to change the world. Counterculture was how they showed they weren’t The Man, but deep down they wanted to be The Man.
So over the years these hippies shift to being more openly authoritarian.
They seek authority, and politically that is seen as right wing… am i making sense?
I think there’s a misinterpretation of my lay suggestions.
Sinema has not changed her view.
Her view has always been maximizing personal power for personal benefit.
She is no more a “leftist” than I am a frog. She draped those views over herself because they fit well enough over her brown shirt to almost hide it, and because she could claim personal benefit from those views.