#ChatGPT wrote me a debate background and questions about ChatGPT in a health sciences course. Debate Background:

ChatGPT is a state-of-the-art language generation model developed by OpenAI. It has been shown to be able to generate highly coherent and realistic text on a wide range of topics. In recent years, it has been suggested that ChatGPT could be used to assist students in writing assignments for health sciences courses.

Debate Questions: 1/2

Debate Qs @speechwoman

1. Is it ethical to use ChatGPT to help students write assignments in a health sciences course?
2. Does the use of ChatGPT improve the quality of students' assignments in health sciences courses?
3. Does the use of ChatGPT have any negative effects on students' learning and critical thinking skills?
4. How should ChatGPT be used in health sciences courses, if at all?
5. What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of using ChatGPT in health sciences courses?

@BronwynHemsley Elon Musk, one of the two founders of its parent company, OpenAi in 2015 (he withdrew in 2018) calls ChatGP "scary good". (Strangely, I sent a reply a short time ago and it seems to have disappeared).
@speechwoman yep, hope he doesn’t buy it back and ruin it too!

1/ 2
@BronwynHemsley I asked ChatGPT to list +/- aspects of Mastodon.

Decentralized platform allows users to have more control over their online experience.

More privacy-focused than many other social networking platforms.

Allows users to control who can see their posts and who can interact with them.

Does not collect or share user data with third parties.

Can be a safer and more enjoyable platform for many users.

Not as well-known or widely used as other social networking platforms.

2/2
@BronwynHemsley

User experience can vary depending on which server you choose to join.

Some servers may have stricter rules or a different culture than others.

May not have all the features and tools that more established platforms have.

Can be a good choice for users who are concerned about their online privacy.

#CW #FacilitatedCommunication
@BronwynHemsley

GUESS WHAT I ASKED IT!

No, facilitated communication (FC) is not based on scientific evidence. In fact, numerous studies have found that the technique is not effective at helping individuals with severe communication disabilities to communicate. These studies have found that the messages produced using FC are not actually coming from the individual with the disability, but are instead being generated by the facilitator. This is because...ETC!

@speechwoman it’s even pretty good if you ask it what FC is (last time I looked)
@BronwynHemsley yes, that’s the fiirst thing I asked it. What are the myths about vaccination? ~ evokes a fabulous answer. I’ve been reducing my Outlook files after a disastrous email malfunction and came across your v2 of the 🐘 tootorial (13/11/22). It’s excellent and god knows how I missed it, but I did. Sorry 😞
@speechwoman no worries ! It’s fine. I am going to use it end of Feb at UTS - if needed beforehand!