What most intrigues me about ChatGPT, etc isn’t nefarious actors weaponizing it, students cheating, human labour replaced, or even datasets being flooded with machine-generated language (tho this’ll all probably happen to an extent).

It’s that it drives *drafting* — used to create first attempts that are tweaked, revised, edited in ways that will feel like non-ML authorship.

But the starting point will have been different.

I wonder/worry about the value & feeling of human starting points.

@ananny Drafting and tweaking is a good point. There will likely be paper mills that produce AI drafts and keep changing them until their AI generated origin is no longer visible. What human origin actually means (and its value) compared to AI origin of a draft needs some more thinking. Could there be a comparison to artistic random writing practices such as rolling dice?