The story via Twitter itself felt a lot more interesting than after Rolling Stone explained it. I do think Elon made a rare poignant statement about First Amendment insofar as Twitter taking instruction from politicians. I didn't realize the missing tweets were hacked nudes.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/elon-musk-twitter-files-1234640842/

Elon Musk's ‘Twitter Files' Exposé on Hunter Biden is a Snoozefest

Earlier this week, Elon Musk teased the release, tweeting, “The public deserves to know what really happened …”

Rolling Stone

@evaschue I think you removed your reply. I wanted to thoughtfully add to what you said though:

They were both things, politicians and campaigners. But I do see your point; The instruction wasn't coming from the White House or other government entity.

I still thought this showed more of a nuanced grasp of the 1st Amendment than what he had said previously, even if you're right that the campaigns are not "the government" as he implies here.

@saulsugarman more to the point, his tweet is just completely wrong under well established constitutional law.