I notice this happening on multiple social media sites, and it always contributes to the death of social networks:
1. Progressives tend to be early adopters because they usually create culture
2. Reactionaries tend to be late adopters because they usually consume culture
3. Reactionaries then try to seize power because the culture isn't to their liking
4. Progressives leave because they want to create culture
5. Then reactionaries leave because no culture is being created
Ex: see screenshot.
What's old is new again. What's happening to Twitter right now already happened to Digg.
Remember the Digg Patriots?
Their attempt to take control of the front page resulted in Digg's doom.
And it's also happening to Facebook. No one goes to Facebook anymore for fresh culture.
When the culture of social media dies, so does the social network.
Of course, what I find *more* fascinating is that the people who own social networks and news publications are almost never progressive.
But they know very well to position their sites as a destination for progressivism -- because progressives create the content people want to see.
A good example is Vice Magazine.
The folks who founded it are the most extreme right wing jerks you'll ever meet.
I mean, Vice co-founder Gavin McInnes also founded the Proud Boys.
As others have pointed out, the gentrification of social networks echoes the gentrification of real life neighbourhoods too.
But it happens a lot quicker.
Notice that right now on Twitter, progressives are kicking up a fuss.
They don't want to leave.
This is their neighbourhood.
But they'll have to leave -- they don't own Twitter. They've always been renters. The only reason you were ever around was to make the place desirable.
And now you're being evicted!
What I want folks of the #TwitterMigration to consider:
When you join Mastodon, be careful about your role in the potential gentrification of this social network!
I say this because I'm noticing more and more high status folk making this their home.
That's fine.
But before you came, this place had a culture -- a very real and vibrant one.
And now that you're here, other high status people are sure to follow -- those people will try to seize this space!
@JPK_elmediat What I fear will happen:
High status people will be inhabit a small amount of instances.
Others will follow because they like being associated with status.
Power will concentrate in those few instances.
Re-centralization occurs yet again.
But this can be avoided if we make decentralization a fundamental value of Mastodon and the Fediverse.
Thanks for this really relevant thread!
#MedMastodon will inherently be more "gentrified" simply due to its purpose for health professionals bailing on #MedTwitter.
HOWEVER, I'm optimistic that we'll use that power for good. In particular, to fight the misinformation of the infodemic.
Did you know - "justice" is one of the tenets of medical ethics?
But, as a society (USA) we do crappy at ensuring justice both in and out of the clinic.
@ZekeMD @JPK_elmediat To be sure, I think there's a place for instances that host accredited and verified voices -- especially for something as critical as medicine. The caveat is: as long as those instances provide spaces for underrepresented communities, of course.
So I think the aims of #MedMastodon are worthwhile, and should be celebrated.
Thanks! Right there with you and be assured I will dunk on anyone that tries to silence the voices of the underprivileged.
This means we all need to have patience, respect, and decorum, even when someone asks a question that may be based in misunderstanding.
Sure, we need to shout down misinformation spreaders. But we need to embrace shared opinions, even if incorrect, so we can have open dialogue. That's how you build trust.
@atomicpoet
@ZekeMD @JPK_elmediat
Going to jump in here and be the asshole as usual — what do you consider accredited for #MedMastodon? Do you have to be a doctor? A nurse? What kind of nurse? An RN? An NP? Do all the lab staff get left out as usual? What about all the other techs, like histotechs / technologists? 
I find that "Experts" are severely limited when it comes to medical discourse, and it tends to cut out a massive amount of us who hold a lot of medical knowledge and are the ones who make the "Experts" look smart in their day to day jobs on a regular basis. 
Just my two cents as a clinical lab scientist. 
@warkittens @atomicpoet @JPK_elmediat
I don't think you're being a jerk (used a different word) - people often talk about doctors while ignoring other health professionals.
That being said, I think I need to defend myself since my prior post specifically used the phraseology "health professionals" rather than "doctor" - on purpose.
Treating patients is a team sport. Like all team sports, you can't win with just one position or player. My 2 cents.
@ZekeMD
@atomicpoet @JPK_elmediat
Lotta docs think allied professionals are uneducated. It's extremely frustrating to witness a new group or society etc being formed, all healthcare workers welcome! And at the end of things, they are only including mostly doctors, PAs, RNs and NPs and extremely similar professionals. 
I'm extremely salty about this kind of thing. There's few lab staff that aren't salty unless they've been drinking ASCP's kool-aid. Nice to hear differently. Remember, be nice to your lab, we're more likely to do favors. 
@warkittens @atomicpoet @JPK_elmediat
Thanks for sharing your frustrations and I'm sorry that other health professionals have treated you poorly.
In my experience, treating your colleagues badly, whether nurses, lab staff, facilities management, your life will be way harder.
My job is impossible without the expertise of folks like you.
But it is true that there is a history of doctors not treating other professions well. Trying to change that!
@warkittens @atomicpoet @JPK_elmediat
You may be also happy to read about some work I did with lab colleagues, which would NOT have been possible without their expertise.
Chris Trottier
Mr. Pataphor, Dadaist Dad
Dr. Zeke
Dani — MLT(ASCP)