Remember: if you get Wikipedia "pls give us money" begging, give to the Internet Archive instead.

The internet archive is perpetually underfunded, whereas Wikipedia has enough cash on hand to continue operating at twice its capacity for about 3 decades.

Editors strongly opposed the wording of the recent beg banner:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1123763881#RfC_on_the_banners_for_the_December_2022_fundraising_campaign

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fundraising_statistics

@indrora The Internet Archive is notorious for stealing content from writers, publishers large and small, and other people who attempt to make culture and intellectual property for a living. Please do not support them.

@magdalen
The internet archive is literally the only place I have found information critical to keeping systems alive because someone happened to upload that purloined content that has become absolute unobtainium otherwise. It has content that because of content publishers going out of existence would have been lost.

Schools depend on it. NASA has depended on it.

It is simultaneously the graveyard and landfill of data.

@indrora Yeah, it does have that appeal. But like many tech efforts, no one seems to have thought through the effects it would have on the workers whose labor makes these efforts possible in the first place.