Those who follow me on The Bad Place have heard me repeat this a thousand times, but once more won't hurt.

Election security is incredibly complex, full of seemingly impossible tradeoffs. But disinformation about supposed "rigged" elections is perhaps the most serious threat to election integrity today.

The best defense is to learn how elections actualy work! Becoming a poll worker is a great way to do that

Also, this National Academies study is a terrific resource:

https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25120/securing-the-vote-protecting-american-democracy

Securing the Vote: Protecting American Democracy

Read online, download a free PDF, or order a copy in print or as an eBook.

The National Academies Press

Also, any serious discussion of election security has to grapple with two simultaneous realities:

- there's no evidence that any US election outcome has ever been altered by hacking

- there are real, exploitable vulnerabilities in many parts of our election infrastructure

I've written a bit on what these vulnerabilities are and how to fix them, See, e.g., this brief article:
https://georgetownlawtechreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4.2-p505-522-Blaze.pdf

@mattblaze I scanned the article and don’t see this covered. Is there a difference beteeen voting machines companies’ equipment and systems vs types of voting machines? Ergo does one company introduce a greater risk than another?

@MirrorMirror Pretty much no. Almost all the major US vendors provide a range of election products, including bad ones (DREs that preclude effective election audits) and good ones (paper scanners, which allow it).

Focusing on the brand is misguided. All precinct equipment is vulnerable to malware and tampering. The question is whether it can be detected and mitigated, which is a function of architecture, not code.

@mattblaze Thank you. It always occurred to me that if some party paid enough money, they might be able to turn a couple of key elections by a few points *at the source,* with the assistance of a voting machine company. Maybe that’s a stretch.