This is big, y'all. Really, really big.
This is big, y'all. Really, really big.
@darthfrosty @danielmiessler That's an interesting thought that has me thinking about the oft-heard axiom of garbage in, garbage out. If you haven't seen it already, here's Daniel's follow up piece on this.
https://danielmiessler.com/blog/ideas-changes-expect-post-chatgpt/
Lots to consider and think about.
@danielmiessler I see there's a raging debate in the art/design industry about the quality of AI art, but to be honest (as a non-expert) I can't tell the difference for many use cases. Which is scary.
It's exciting and fun to play with these new AI tools, but the implications are only beginning to sink in. I don't think wider society is quite aware either of how close we are to something which may lead to huge changes for society. Has Security implications also.
I suspect an entire new category of jobs will emerge very soon. These jobs will be for people who can curate AI generators (art, text, programming). Not all these AI generators will be used for good. I think we should all be watching very closely.
@danielmiessler “Suggest better wording when communicating with people based on knowing how they like to receive information” - have you read Avogadro Corp? Highly recommend.
Maybe, but there needs to be a serious look at how these things got their training data:
Today I got to the end of an "AI generated" story (from a different tool, not #ChatGPT ) and asked it for an epilogue. It provided one and then gave the Twitter account and email address, apparently for the author of some of the training data!